Despite Concerns, Island County And Oak Harbor Move Forward With Annexation

On March 19, 2026, the City of Oak Harbor and the Board of Island County Commissioners (BOCC) held a public hearing to discuss an interlocal agreement between the city and the county regarding the annexation of almost 80 acres currently within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) that Oak Harbor has identified as "vacant and underdeveloped" into the city limits. The City has requested annexation of this land to accommodate population growth outlined in the Island County Comprehensive Plan. Both jurisdictions are required to approve the interlocal agreement before continuing with annexation.


During public testimony, WEAN Executive Director Marnie Jackson urged Island County and the City of Oak Harbor to reconsider the terms of the proposed interlocal agreement before it is finalized and to follow the sequencing outlined by the Growth Management Act (GMA) by addressing current "donut holes," developed areas of unincorporated Island County surrounded by land incorporated into the City of Oak Harbor, before annexing any additional land. ("Donut holes" on the map above are represented in grey, surrounded by blue.)


"The GMA does not allow a city to manufacture a capacity shortage through declining to upzone and develop infrastructure appropriately, nor to allow that manufactured shortage to justify pushing growth into unincorporated land on the fringes of the city, furthest from urban services, and objectively less suitable for the denser, more affordable housing that the data shows we need," said Jackson.


State law, RCW 36.70A.110, directs that urban growth first be located in areas already characterized by urban development, rather than on land characterized as "vacant and undeveloped." Island County's own Comprehensive Plan, in accordance with that statute, directs urban development first to areas within municipal boundaries. 


"Existing urban areas must be served and incorporated before or concurrent with new land being added at the fringe," stated Jackson. She also reminded both jurisdictions that Whidbey Environmental Action Network reserves the right to challenge this agreement before the Growth Management Hearings Board within the window following adoption, on the grounds that the jurisdictions did not follow the sequencing explicitly outlined by the GMA.


Rose Hughes, Managing Director of affordable housing developer Island Roots Housing, also gave public comment opposing the annexation proposal, arguing that it would put lower-income people on the fringes of the city, if affordable housing could be built in those areas at all. Hughes highlighted that the median hourly wage for working residents of Island County is $17.33, and that a significant portion of Island County workers earn less than 35% of the Area Median Income while working full-time. She also noted that the current proposal wouldn't create competitive conditions for affordable housing developers to receive the grant funding required to build in the annexed areas.


"If the purpose of this proposed annexation is for the farthest reaches of Oak Harbor to be the areas for higher density, low-income housing, you are literally saying that rather than accommodate rental housing within walking distance of where people work, you are going to put them on the edges of town and reserve the core of town for people who are not the residents, who are the backbone of the city's economic activity," said Hughes.


"I want to remind you that jurisdictions have a state-mandated obligation to provide equitable planning and housing opportunities for all income demographics across all areas of their jurisdiction," continued Hughes. "Is this annexation and zoning plan meeting these goals?"


Before public comment, Island County Planner Emily Neff assured the Board that the City and County have committed to working together through a separate interlocal agreement to address the "donut hole" areas that are surrounded by city land but not currently within city limits. The details of that separate agreement, or its current stage of development, were not shared by County staff during the meeting.


After brief deliberation, the City of Oak Harbor and the Board of Island County Commissioners both voted to approve the interlocal agreement as is, allowing the City of Oak Harbor to proceed with the annexation. The annexation process will occur at an upcoming Oak Harbor City Council Meeting, tentatively scheduled for April 7, 2026, at the time of the public hearing.


See the Oak Harbor City Council agenda center here

Watch the public hearing here.

By Nia Martin June 22, 2026
Speak Up For Clover Valley Creek And Wetlands In Oak Harbor
By Marnie Jackson June 9, 2026
Introducing WEAN's 2026 Summer Benefit Sponsors
By Amanda Bullis May 29, 2026
May 2026 Newsletter
By Amanda Bullis May 29, 2026
Senator Maria Cantwell has been a champion of the Roadless Area Conservation Act (RACA) since she first introduced it as a bill in Congress in 2002. In fact, she's reintroduced the bill in the Senate ten times, including this past year.
By Amanda Bullis May 28, 2026
The Island County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the final draft of the Comprehensive Plan on May 20, 2026, which continued to a date certain on My 27, where the commission approved the "findings of fact" presented by the county planning staff.
By Amanda Bullis May 6, 2026
Read our April 2026 Newsletter for updates on Earth Day events & ecosystem protection efforts. Join us in advocacy for a healthier environment.
By Amanda Bullis May 6, 2026
March 2026 Newsletter covers the annexation of 80 acres in Oak Harbor. Join us in advocating for ecosystem protection!
By Amanda Bullis March 19, 2026
Join the community in protecting ecosystems. Participate in the public comment period for Island County's Comprehensive Plan!
By Amanda Bullis February 24, 2026
Read our January 2026 Newsletter with updates on Comprehensive Planning & a tribute to Nancy Nordhoff. Join us in protecting local ecosystems.
By Amanda Bullis February 6, 2026
This past week, the Island County BOCC and the Planning Commission both met to discuss the Economic Development element and the Clinton Subarea Plan.